<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Vulnerability on 梦兽编程</title><link>https://rexai.top/en/tags/vulnerability/</link><description>Recent content in Vulnerability on 梦兽编程</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.163.3</generator><language>en</language><copyright>梦兽编程</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rexai.top/en/tags/vulnerability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A 1000x Gap: How Google Used Rust to Push Memory-Safety Bugs Below 20% — and the Playbook You Can Copy</title><link>https://rexai.top/en/tutorials/rust/rust-memory-safety-cve/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rexai.top/en/tutorials/rust/rust-memory-safety-cve/</guid><description>In 2025 Google disclosed that memory-safety vulnerabilities on Android fell below 20% for the first time, and Rust code carries roughly 1000x fewer memory-safety bugs per million lines than C/C++. This article breaks down why, shows a C/Rust use-after-free comparison, and gives an actionable checklist.</description></item></channel></rss>